When experiencing two-way communications failure, which step is appropriate?

In the event of a two-way communications failure, the most appropriate step is to continue under VFR (Visual Flight Rules) conditions and land as soon as practical. This option allows the pilot to maintain visual contact with the ground or other aircraft while navigating safely to an airport.

Under VFR, pilots are responsible for maintaining their own separation from other aircraft and for avoiding hazards, which is manageable if they can see and evaluate their surroundings. This approach aligns with regulations that dictate pilots should safely navigate to a landing as soon as feasible while making use of their visual abilities until communication can be reestablished.

Broadcasting on all frequencies, while well-intentioned, is not typically advisable as it can lead to confusion and unnecessary frequency congestion without necessarily resolving the situation. Landing immediately at the nearest airport without assessing conditions may introduce additional risks, particularly if that airport is not suited for landing due to weather or operational status. Reducing altitude to below 10,000 feet does not directly address the communication failure and should not be a primary consideration in this scenario.

Thus, continuing under VFR conditions and seeking to land as soon as practical is the solution that prioritizes safety, situational awareness, and efficient management of the situation.